This midterm review synthesizes evaluation findings from the design phase of A360 and the first few quarters of implementation (Aug 2016 – Sep 2018), drawing together insights from an ongoing process evaluation, a cost-effectiveness analysis, and the baseline findings from an outcome evaluation. Although the review does not determine the effectiveness of the solutions and therefore A360 as a whole, it finds that the value of the A360 approach is starting to emerge, while also highlighting a number of challenges and trade-offs that the consortium continues to navigate. The MTE’s takeaways are useful for evaluators of HCD and adaptive programs (see page 10), and for donors and future ASRH implementers (see page 49).
- HCDExchange
- 5
- Resource LIBRARY
- 5
- Midterm Review of the Adolescents 360 Program
Midterm Review of the Adolescents 360 Program
Publication Year: 2019
Contributing Organisation: Avenir Health,Itad,London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Authors:
Learning Themes: Adolescent Insights,Measurement & Evaluation,Quality & Standards,Youth Integration
Tags: Adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health, Adolescent sexual and reproductive health, Adolescents 360, Berkeley, Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, Cost-effectiveness analysis study, Federal Ministry of Health Family planning, Focus group discussion, Health Extension Program, Health Extension Worker, Human-centered design, In-depth interview, Interpersonal communication Key informant interview, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Long Acting Reversible Contraceptive, Matasa Matan Arewa Midterm review Ministry of Health, Modern contraceptive prevalence rate, Monitoring and evaluation Outcome evaluation, Participatory Action Research Public Health Center, Population Services International, Process evaluation, Quality assurance, Sexual and reproductive health Technical assistance, Society for Family Health, Theory of Change Technical Working Group, University of California, Women’s Development Army
