Measuring a ‘Moving Target’- Designing evaluations for adaptive programs
HCD has a unique ability to bring new ideas to entrenched problems, integrate multiple stakeholder perspectives, and bring in a strong human lens. Differences between conventional evaluation approaches and the inherent fluidity that is required for HCD and adaptive implementation invariably makes it challenging for practitioners to think about how to best evaluate HCD or adaptive programs.
Why does design matter?
In this framework, Design for Health explains how the “double diamond model” illustrates the complementary nature of design and global health processes. Explore the different roles that design can play in global health programming including how it can act...
ASRHR insights from A360’s Kuwa Mjanja in Tanzania
Five years after the launch of its first-ever intervention aimed at increasing girls’ access to and demand for modern contraception, through country-specific interventions, A360 is closing out its inaugural intervention – Kuwa Mjanja – in Tanzania. They...
