Tackling Provider Bias in Contraceptive Service Delivery- Lessons from the Beyond Bias project
The presentation provides an overview of the Beyond Bias project approach, describes the behavior change strategy developed
and are being implemented, and shares some reflections and insights gleaned along the way for tackling bias
24 Downloads
The presentation provides an overview of the Beyond Bias project approach, describes the behavior change strategy developed
and are being implemented, and shares some reflections and insights gleaned along the way for tackling bias
Additional information
| Author(s) | Melanie Punton, Emma Mulhern, Gabrielle Appleford |
|---|---|
| Website | |
| Distribution License | Free |
| Copyright Holder | PSI |
Related products
-
Integrating Human-Centered Design in a Multidisciplinary Effort to Address Provider Bias: a Summary of the Beyond Bias Experience (Part 3)
Add To FavouritesIntegrating Human-Centered Design in a Multidisciplinary Effort to Address Provider Bias: a Summary of the Beyond Bias Experience (Part 3)
This executive summary unpacks the use of HCD in ‘Beyond Bias’, an adolescent focused project that addresses provider bias. Along with providing an overview of the HCD methodology used, and the solutions generated by the project, this publication also reflects on the use of HCD in an ASRH project. It highlights the value additions of using human centered design, the key challenges that were faced, and important recommendations informed by project learnings. This is a good resource for designers and ASRH implementers to understand the application, benefits and limitations of the HCD process in the context of ASRH.
-
A360 Process Evaluation Methodology: Updated July 2019
Add To FavouritesA360 Process Evaluation Methodology: Updated July 2019
The Process Methodology document presents a descriptive and analytical account of how the implementation of A360 has played out, with the aim of improving understanding of how and why A360 is making a difference, in order to generate lessons for future policy and practice. Clear questions guiding this Process Evaluation were established at end of the pilot phase with deliberate emphasis to better understand and document A360’s implementation approach. Questions articulated in this paper focus on process, context and solutions, with a detailed explanation on select methods used in the evaluation.
-
Conference Report Young Designer’s Global Conference
Add To FavouritesConference Report Young Designer’s Global Conference
This is a report of the first conference organised by and for young people engaged as designers in the Adolescent360 projects across Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania. The report outlines the agenda for the two-day online conference on Meaningful Youth Engagement, with information on what was discussed in each session. It highlights insights on MYE from attendee’s own experiences, and offers reccommendations on the promotion and improvement of MYE. This resource can offer good guidance for implementers, designers, youth, and evaluators seeking to practice MYE in HCD+ASRH programs.
-
Sexuality Education During Covid-19: Exploring the potential of adapting the Dance4Life empowerment model to the digital environment.
Add To FavouritesSexuality Education During Covid-19: Exploring the potential of adapting the Dance4Life empowerment model to the digital environment.
This is a report on the process Rutgers International went through to adapt and prototype their Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) curriculum to a digital version during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020.
Related products
-
Youth Engagement Plan – PSI Ethiopia
Add To FavouritesYouth Engagement Plan – PSI Ethiopia
This guidance document captures how PSI Ethiopia engaged youth as Young Designers in the Adolescent 360 program. It provides practitioners with a comprehensive list of considerations when planning for youth (including a workplan template).
-
Integrating Human-Centered Design in a Multidisciplinary Effort to Address Provider Bias: A Summary of the Beyond Bias Experience
Add To FavouritesIntegrating Human-Centered Design in a Multidisciplinary Effort to Address Provider Bias: A Summary of the Beyond Bias Experience
With an aim to expand the knowledge base of application of HCD in global health programs, the Beyond Bias project has documented, in a three-part series, its experience using HCD in a multidisciplinary approach to develop effective, scalable adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health interventions. The briefs cover programmatic challenges and opportunities, outline salient ideas and concepts that were generated and tested, share key insights on provider bias, and present the finalized intervention design.
-
Connecting Contraception to Girls’ Lives and Aspirations in Southern Nigeria: The Case of 9ja Girls
Add To FavouritesConnecting Contraception to Girls’ Lives and Aspirations in Southern Nigeria: The Case of 9ja Girls
Led by PSI and implemented by SFH Nigeria, 9ja Girls works in partnership with A360 young leaders and across Nigeria’s public health facilities to support unmarried girls aged 15-19 to identify their dreams, and then understand the role contraception can play to take them one step closer to achieving their goals. This technical brief presents the case of 9ja Girls, offering lessons for similar ASRH programs seeking to design and implement scalable, sustainable, community-based programming with and for adolescents.
-
Midterm Review of the Adolescents 360 Program
Add To FavouritesMidterm Review of the Adolescents 360 Program
This midterm review synthesizes evaluation findings from the design phase of A360 and the first few quarters of implementation (Aug 2016 – Sep 2018), drawing together insights from an ongoing process evaluation, a cost-effectiveness analysis, and the baseline findings from an outcome evaluation. Although the review does not determine the effectiveness of the solutions and therefore A360 as a whole, it finds that the value of the A360 approach is starting to emerge, while also highlighting a number of challenges and trade-offs that the consortium continues to navigate. The MTE’s takeaways are useful for evaluators of HCD and adaptive programs (see page 10), and for donors and future ASRH implementers (see page 49).